beta
Text
1. The defendant gives each point to the plaintiff and each point of the attached Form 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 1 among each land listed in the attached list.
Reasons
1. Determination as to the cause of claim
A. 1) Each land listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each land of this case”)
On July 30, 2004, the ownership transfer registration was completed in the Plaintiff’s future on August 3, 2004.2) around 2005, the Defendant installed a steel-frame structure (Pipe) warehouse on each of the instant lands, and installed an appraisal map (1), 2, 3, 4, 5, and 1 on each of the instant lands; 62 square meters of the instant land for a sand site location panel structure (6, 7, 8, 9, and 6 of the same drawings; 3 square meters of the sandd position panel structure (3 square meters in the instant land); 10, 11, 12, 13, and 10; 121 square meters; 21 square meters; 36 meters of the instant land to each of the instant areas; 40 square meters of the instant land to each of the instant areas; 25 square meters of the number of the instant land to each of the aforementioned areas; 30 square meters of the instant land to each of the instant areas; 4.22 meters of the instant land to each of the instant land.
C. On the premise that a de facto marital relationship had existed with the Plaintiff, the Defendant filed a claim for division of property, etc. against the Plaintiff, including the content that each of the instant land was the subject of division of property, against the Plaintiff, under the Suwon District Court’s Ansan Branch Decision 2013Ddan4196, on August 22, 2014, the Defendant was dismissed on the ground that the Plaintiff and the Defendant did not have a de facto marital relationship with the Plaintiff on August 22, 2014. The appeal against the said judgment was dismissed, and the final appeal
[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Gap evidence 4-1, 2, and 3-3, Gap evidence 3-1 to 6-6, Gap's measurement and appraisal result, the purport of the whole pleadings
B. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is in a loan relationship with the plaintiff for use.