The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

1. The summary of the case and the facts premised on the case

A. The summary of the instant case pertains to a case involving: (a) the Defendant embezzled the budget to the Plaintiff, who is a police officer, while taking charge of the Plaintiff’s budget execution work as of June 18, 2013; and (b) asserting that disciplinary action on dismissal and imposition of surcharges are unlawful on the grounds that the Defendant violated the duty of good faith, duty of obey, and duty to maintain dignity under the State Public Officials Act;

The judgment of the first instance dismissed the plaintiff's claim, and the plaintiff appealed against it.

[Related Acts and subordinate statutes] Attached Form

B. The premise factual basis is that (i) the Plaintiff was appointed as a policeman on December 30, 1987 and was promoted on March 1, 2009; (ii) B police station from February 19, 2009 to February 9, 201; and (iii) police officers working at the Seoul Central Police Station C from February 14, 2013 to June 18, 2013.

Pursuant to Article 6 (3) of the Police Officers Act and Article 4 (1) of the Decree on the Appointment of Police Officers, the defendant shall be the commissioner of a district police agency delegated with

⑵ 피고의 원고에 대한 해임처분과 징계부가금 부과처분 ㈎ 2012. 11. 9. 이루어진 2012년도 경찰청 정기감사 과정에서 원고가 B경찰서에서 근무하면서 2009. 8. 7.부터 2010. 8. 12.까지 B경찰서 수사지원팀의 수사예산인 기소중지자검거비, 특정업무경비, 참고인여비, 신고보상금이 보관된 4개 예금계좌에서 마음대로 현금을 인출하거나 다른 계좌로 이체한 행위가 적발되었다.

㈏ 서울중부경찰서 경찰공무원 보통징계위원회는 2013. 6. 13. 원고가 2009. 8. 7.부터 2010. 8. 12.까지 사이에 B경찰서 수사지원팀의 수사예산이 보관된 4개 예금 계좌에서 무단으로 현금을 인출(4회, 170만 원)하거나 계좌이체(14회, 680만 원)하여 약값이나 여성의류, 화장품 구입...