logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.07.19 2018고정168
명예훼손등
Text

All of the public prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. Defendant A- defamation, insult, and insult Defendant on March 24, 2017, at the Feminy office in Busan Feminy-gu, around 10:00 to 10:30 on March 24, 2017, “I see that I would go to go back to J and go back to feminy and go back to feminy,” and “I will go to go to feminy,” and “I will go to go to feminy.

The term “the victimJ’s honor is damaged by openly pointing out false facts by speaking at a large interest,” and “G et al., and the evague is a food ero in which 5 billion won in erogen is erogen.”

“.....” and “..... the head of the Gu, at the low fluore test, shall be held as soon as possible.

The victim J was openly insultingd by referring to a large interest to the attached “J.”

B. Defendant B - The Defendant, at the above date, time, place, and “J shall have written a cover of the face.”

The low feat has been drinking 5 billion won in Korea.

“The victim J was openly insulting by referring to a large interest.”

(c)

Defendant

C- At the above date, at the above time and place, the Defendant sexually insultingd the Victim J by referring to the so-called “feasible and without any value to be expressed.”

2. Of the facts charged against the Defendants in this case, the offense of insult is subject to victim’s complaint (Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act) and the offense of defamation is the offense of defamation of reputation (Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act). According to the records, it is recognized that the victim expressed a specific intent not to punish the Defendants after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case against the Defendants is dismissed in entirety in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 5 and 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow