The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The facts charged in this case

1. Defendant B

A. The Defendant, on May 28, 2015, committed the crime, around 15:00 on May 28, 2015, committed the crime, on the ground that it interferes with the guard room’s business in the Nam-gu Busan metropolitan area around Busan metropolitan area around May 28, 2015, he/she would cut the processed matter to the victim “I see the processed matter in the body of the company, and I am the processed matter, if I am in the guard room any more than one time. I will put the processed matter back to the snow.

“The victim was openly insultingd by referring to a large at the location where the security guard D is located.”

B. On May 30, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime on May 30, 2015, at around 15:00, at the places indicated in the above paragraph 1-A around May 30, 2015, and again, to the victim A who was sitting in the guard room at another place, “Is the victim who was sitting in the guard room at a low singing year, she would have to make a report on 112 of the singing year, she will drink boom, bear the expenses, and shesa.

h. The victim publicly insultingd the victim at the location of the security guard D, stating it as a large interest.

2. Defendant A

A. A. On May 28, 2015, the Defendant, at around 15:00 on May 28, 2015, insultingly insulting the victim by openly insulting the victim on the ground that the Defendant: (a) at the place indicated in the above paragraph 1-A on May 28, 2015, the Defendant stated that the Defendant, outside the victim B, would not sit in the guard room; and (b) on the ground that “If the head of the Gu in the Republic of Korea gives special and distinct consent, the Defendant would have to do so.”

B. On May 30, 2015, the Defendant committed a crime on May 30, 2015, at the places indicated in the above paragraph 1(a) around 15:00 on May 30, 2015, the Victim B made the Defendant a defect, “Is, rights and interests.”

Chewing flag fluent A. Emcom flaz.

Moreover, she worked for a period of her thickness, her year, she worked for a period of her fluority, she worked for a period of her fluority, and her she worked for a period of her fluority. Ghana

“The victim was openly insultingd by referring to a large at the location where the security guard D is located.”

2. We examine the judgment, and each of the charges of this case against the Defendants is a crime falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act. According to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act, the injured party is a victim.