logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.02.03 2016고단2486 (1)
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,00,000, and a fine of KRW 500,000, respectively.

2. The defendants are above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On January 29, 2016, from around February 23, 2016 to around February 23, 2016, the Defendant operated a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name “D” as “D,” and employed E, etc. as female employees on condition that KRW 60,000 won per customer would be paid per unit of KRW 100,000,000,000, and caused the said E to do any similar act, such as having the said E receive KRW 100,000 from the customer F and creating a sexual organ in return for the said act.

B. From June 1, 2016 to July 12, 2016, the Defendant operated the same trade name as Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C 1320, and employed E, B, etc. as female employee on the condition that he/she pays KRW 100,000 to KRW 60,000,000 per customer’s total amount of KRW 10,000 or KRW 130,000,000 per customer, and caused the said B to do an act of similarity, such as receiving KRW 130,00 from G from the customer, giving him/her a sexual organ as a reward, and giving him/her an assessment.

As a result, the Defendant committed an act such as arranging sexual traffic for each of the above periods.

2. Defendant B: (a) around June 20, 2016, around 16:40, the Defendant received 130,000 won from customers G at a sexual traffic business establishment in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “D” (C 1320) and engaged in sexual traffic as described in paragraph (b).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police in relation to F and G;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of on-site photographs at the time of crackdown);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs without field of control;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: The written indictment in Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation, etc. of Sexual Traffic, “Article 19(1)2” is a clerical error.

(generally, selection of fines)

B. Defendant B: Article 21(1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts (Selection of Penalty)

2. A aggravated Defendant A: the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act.

arrow