logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.11.07 2016고단4489
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates a sexual traffic business establishment on the second floor of the D D Building in Changwon-si, with the trade name "E", and Defendant B received 130,000 won per month as an employee of the above business establishment and managed the management, such as calculation of the price of sexual traffic, customer guidance, cleaning of the business establishment, prompt cleaning, preparation of meals for female employees.

person is a person.

From October 3, 2016 to November 20, 2016, the Defendants: (a) employed sexual traffic women in the above business establishment from around October 3, 2016 to around November 20:50; (b) received 100,000 won in cash from the 130,000 won to the women of unspecified male customers who find the above business establishment; and (c) paid half of the said amount to the women of sexual traffic; and (d) agreed with the above women of sexual traffic to have the said women, and (e) made them to engage in similar acts, such as making the said women to see and see the sexual organ of unspecified male customers in return for the payment of sexual traffic.

As a result, Defendants conspired to act as commercial sex acts such as brokerage.

Summary of Evidence

Defendant

A according to each of the above evidence, according to the police interrogation protocol (part) G of the witness I in the legal statement of the witness I in the court, and whether the police interrogation protocol (whether the defendant A was aware of the fact that the act of similarity was done at the business establishment of the defendant B) of H with the police interrogation protocol (which is discovered of the fact that the act of disturbance was done at the business establishment of the defendant B), whether the control police officer first visited the business establishment in which the guest would be the "sexual intercourse" by visiting the business establishment in which the customer

In light of the fact that Defendant B said that it is possible to conduct the act of similarity only, Defendant B’s act of similarity is recognized, and Defendant B was residing at a lower business establishment, and the women with Chinese nationality are deemed to have talked with Defendant B within the business establishment that is not familiar with Korean, and thus, Defendant B’s act of similarity within the business establishment.

arrow