The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a real estate consulting business entity.

On May 28, 2015, around 00:50, the Defendant consulted the victim D (55 tax and South) to take over a "F hotel" located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Sungnam-si, Seoul-si, B, with a view to having the victim D (55 tax and South Korea) face, but the victim said that the Defendant did not inform the hotel of the fact that national and local taxes are provisionally seized 240 million won, and that the victim did not know that the above hotel did not know the Defendant of the provisional seizure of 240 million won. The victim assaulted the Defendant that spawn and the Defendant had spawned the alcohol contained in the instant World Cup to the victim's face.

2. We examine the judgment. The case is a crime falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act. According to the agreement bound in the trial records of this case, it is recognized that the victim expressed his/her intent not to prosecute the above defendant after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.