The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On May 12, 2018, the Defendant’s office in the public hall was under drinking by dividing the Defendant’s daily behaviors, the victim E (the age of 19), the victim F (the age of 18), the victim G (the remaining, the age of 18) and the victim G (the age of 18), and the Defendant’s sexual intercourse related to the victim F’s sexual f's sexual f’s sexual f’s sexual f’s sexual f’s sexual f’s sexual f’s sexual f’s sexual f’s sexual f’s sexual f’s sexual f’s sexual f’s sexual f’s sexual f’s sexual f’s sexual f’s sexual f’s sexual f’s sexual f’s sexual f’s sexual f’s sexual f’s sexual f’

While the victims and the victims were in conflict at the above date and time and at the above location, the defendant she saw that the victims et al. al were humed and humd about the age rather than the defendant, and collected plastic cups containing water that had been laid on the table table, to the victim E and the victim G, caused the victims to fry water in the instant cups, followed by the victim E again, and assaulted the headal kums by hand.

2. Determination:

(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 260 (3) and (1) of the Criminal Act;

B. After the prosecution of this case, the victims wish not to punish the defendant.

(c) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;