1. The Defendant’s disposition of determining a disability grade against the Plaintiff on February 1, 2018 shall be revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Details of the disposition;

(a) On May 7, 2014, the Plaintiff, as a worker B’s employee, caused a crashed accident in the course of the business of closing the board at the construction site DD located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu (hereinafter “instant disaster”), (i) the upper left-hand breath, (ii) the fluoral mination of the upper-hand blag, (iii) the external fluoral flag, (ii) the external flag, (iv) the external flag, (inwards, lower walls, side walls, and upper walls), (vi) the upper-hand flag, the left-hand side of the upper-hand flag, (iii) the external flag, the external flagal fluoral flag, (iv) the external flag, the 1stal fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral flag, and (iv) the approval of the two fluoral furine.

B. On January 23, 2018, the Plaintiff filed a claim for disability benefits with the Defendant. On February 1, 2018, the Defendant rendered a claim against the Plaintiff for disability benefits, the Defendant rendered a disposition of grade 11 [as for the Plaintiff, Grade 12: Grade 7 (in cases of persons who have become unable to conceal their noses or smells), Grade 16 (in cases of persons who have a minor functional disorder in sons, persons who have a minor functional disorder in sons, those who have a minor disorder in sons, or those who have a serious vertebal disorder in Do on sons, and those who have a serious vertebal disorder in sons), Grade 14, Grade 10 (in cases of national part of national part, remaining - general dynamics), Grade 13 [as for those who have a visual disorder in 13th grade (in cases of snow 6th grade), Grade 14 (In cases of snow gal disability)].

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 to 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion on this ground.