1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)

(a) Attached Form 1 among the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

1. Basic facts

A. On February 18, 2010, the Plaintiff leased to the Defendant the part B of warehouse B in the ship, which connects each point of 1,2,3,4, and 1 indicated in the attached Form No. 1 among the real estate listed in the attached Table No. 1 to the Defendant in sequence, KRW 30,000 per month rent.

B. On May 21, 2011, the Defendant stored goods, such as the Defendant’s beams ( majority of the lower court, the Round, the Round, the Round, etc.) in the warehouse of the first basement. On the ground of the foregoing, an accident occurred in which some of the above goods (hereinafter “the instant damaged goods”) were milched in water due to water leakage in the water pipe of the said warehouse.

C. After the above accident, the Plaintiff, in order to keep the goods in the warehouse of the first floor underground, had the Defendant use without compensation the attached Form 2 No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 of the attached Table No. 2 among the real estate listed in the attached Table No. 2 in the order of priority among the real estate No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 (hereinafter “Ground No. 2 warehouse”).

The Defendant did not pay the rent for the warehouse on the first floor from December 2012 to July 2014. The sum of the unpaid rent from December 2012 to July 2014 is KRW 600,000 (= KRW 30,000 per month rent x 20 months).

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1, the result of the on-site inspection by this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. As seen above, it is reasonable to view that the Defendant’s judgment on the claim for the principal claim is not paid twice or more of the rent for the warehouse of the first floor above the ground, and that the duplicate of the instant complaint was delivered to the Defendant on September 3, 2014 by serving the Defendant on the first floor warehouse of the Plaintiff’s underground floor and the second floor warehouse of the underground floor, and that both the above lease and the loan for use were legally terminated. In full view of the purport of the argument in the statement in the evidence No. 2 of the argument, the rent for the second floor warehouse of the underground floor is equivalent to KRW 30,

Therefore, the defendant returned the above warehouse to the plaintiff, and the unpaid rent of KRW 600,000 until July 2014 and the warehouse of the first floor from August 1, 2014.