The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal was as follows: (a) the Defendant destroyed the mail managed by the victim as indicated in the following facts charged.

2. Determination

A. The court below held that evidence consistent with the facts charged in this case includes the statements made by the victim at the court of the court below and the police, CCTV screen and mail box. ① The victim stated in the police that "I am going on August 25, 2013, the mail of this case" and stated that "I am on August 25, 2013, it was discovered that I am on August 25, 2013" in wire conversations with police officers at the time of interrogation of the defendant. This stated to the effect that "I am on the CCTV screen which was recorded on August 25, 2013, it is inconsistent with the record that I am on August 17:11, 2013, and it is difficult for the defendant to believe that the victim's statement made at the police station cannot be trusted, and ② in the court of the court of the court below, the victim stated that it was difficult for the defendant to be aware of the fact that it was in fact hard for the victim's first time on the CCTV screen."