1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

No game products related business entity shall allow others to gamble or perform other speculative acts using game products, or leave them to do so, and no one shall provide game products with contents different from those classified, for distribution or use, and shall exchange tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of the game products.

1. On January 2018, Defendant A asked Defendant A to work as the chief of the management department in charge of securing and attracting customers, who operated D (hereinafter “instant game site”) located in the Haba-gu and the 2nd floor of Busan, Seoba-gu, Busan (hereinafter “instant game site”).

The instant game room is located in 4,500 won after installing and altering a program able to exchange, different from the rating classification decision in each of the 30 games of the “Receipt Daejeon” and “Stol World War,” and then exchanging 4,500 won after deducting 10% of the fee per point of points acquired by customers through the games. From January 30, 2018 to March 7, 2018, Defendant A urged customers from January 30, 2018 to call out text messages, etc. in the instant game room, and provided guidance to customers who want to exchange, etc., to secure customers and attract them.

As a result, Defendant A provided game products with contents different from the classified contents in collusion with Defendant A, and had customers perform speculative acts using game products by exchanging tangible and intangible results acquired by customers through the use of game products.

2. On January 26, 2018, Defendant B leased 30,000,000 won per month to E and F operating the above game room, each of the 30 games, including the “Receipt Daejeon”, and the “True War” games, which altered the program available for money exchange, by installing a program available for money exchange unlike the rating classification decision, on condition that Defendant B leased 20,000 won per month.

Accordingly, Defendant B was rated in collusion with E and F.