The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the defendant is an elevator repair engineer who is the victim B (the male, the age of 38) with the workplace rent.

On August 5, 2016, around 08:30 on August 5, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed assault to the victim on the ground that the amount of singing expenses distributed to the Defendant was changed to the victim, but the victim was not aware of it; (b) the Defendant’s face, head body, etc. were met.

2. The offense of assault against judgment shall not be prosecuted against the express will of the victim under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, the "Agreement" was submitted on August 18, 2016 and October 31, 2016, which was after the institution of the instant prosecution, to the effect that the Defendant does not want to be punished.

It is so decided as per Disposition, since there is a declaration of intention not to punish a person under Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.