The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. At around 17:50 on February 13, 2020, the Defendant assaulted the victim D (23 years of age) on the ground that the victim D (23 years of age) was fright and resisting the Defendant’s daily activities in Ulsan-gu B cafeteria, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, on the ground that the Defendant was fright and resisting the Defendant’s daily activities, booming the victim’s bath, booming the victim’s neck up to the floor of the second

2. The offense of assault under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act in the judgment shall not be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim as an offense of an anti-roption penalty.

According to the records, on March 18, 2020, after the prosecution of this case, a "agreement" was submitted to this court on March 18, 2020, to the effect that "the injured party only agrees with the defendant and thus withdraws the complaint."

This constitutes a case where there is an expression of intent not to punish a person under Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and thus, it is so decided as per Disposition as to the facts charged in this case.