logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.09.23 2015고단3056
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등존속상해)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 1, 2015, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violence, etc. (a collective action, threat to the lineal ascendant of a deadly weapon, etc.) and the Defendant who sustained bodily injury caused by assaulting the victim, his father, who is his father, collected the flowers from the victim D (the age of 47) on the ground that he / she would take a bath to the Defendant on the ground that he was able to boom him, and she committed an assault, such as the victim’s chest, her chest, face fat, etc., going beyond the living room, making it difficult for the victim to know the number of days of treatment.

The defendant continued to enter a kitchen and took excessive steps, which are dangerous objects in the Washington, and expressed the attitude that the defendant would inflict any harm on the body of the victim, and threatened the victim.

2. At around 00:10 on March 2, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties by a police officer in relation to criminal investigation, such as: (a) on the ground that a slope F of the E box called “A”, who was called out after having received a report of 112 at the same place as Paragraph (1), does not enter the Defendant’s horse; (b) in his/her hand, he/she was unable to perform his/her legitimate duties by a police officer in relation to criminal investigation, such as: (c) intending to see a flabbbbbing with a flaps; and

3. Around 00:20 on March 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the property by cutting the fire corresponding to KRW 100,000,00 in the market value of the victim slopeF owned by the Busan Franchistation, which was arrested as a flagrant offender for the same reason as paragraph (1), at the Busan Franchiscop Police Station located in Franchiscop G, on the ground that the Defendant did not unfasten the lock.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Each police statement made to H and F;

1. Investigation report (on the site exit status, site photographs, etc.) - Application of statutes, such as site photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 257(2) and (1) (the point of injury to a lineal ascendant and the choice of imprisonment) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

arrow