[Defendant-Appellee] Ten others (Law Firm Han-tae, Attorney Kang In-bok, Counsel for defendant-appellee)

Choi Su-gun (Attorney Do-won et al., Counsel for the defendant-appellant)

August 23, 2006

Seoul Northern District Court Decision 2005Da28263 Decided December 6, 2005

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

1. Purport of claim

The defendant shall pay 2,57,222 won to the plaintiff Jeong-tae, 4,298,915 won to the plaintiff Lee Jong-tae, 2,611,200 won to the plaintiff Lee Jong-tae, and 2,550,141 won to the plaintiff Lee Jong-tae, 6,280,425 won to the plaintiff Lee Jong-tae, and 2,906,102 won to the plaintiff Cho Jong-tae, 4,863,003 won to the plaintiff Kim Jong-tae, 4,484,361 won to the plaintiff Kim Jong-tae, and 3,63,563 won to the plaintiff Kim Jong-tae, and 2,09,203 won to the plaintiff Lee Jong-tae, and 6,511,203 won to the plaintiff Lee Jong-tae, and 20% interest per annum from the next day to the day of complete payment of the complaint.

2. Purport of appeal

The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant shall be revoked, and all of the plaintiffs' claims corresponding thereto shall be dismissed.

1. The court's explanation of this case is the same as the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is decided to accept this as it is in accordance with Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. If so, the judgment of the first instance is just and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Jeong-soo (Presiding Judge)