beta
Plaintiff, Appellant
Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Law Firm Boo, Attorneys Min-tae, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)
Defendant, appellant and appellant
Yangyang-gun (Attorney Han-hee, Counsel for defendant-appellant)
Conclusion of Pleadings
September 12, 2012
The first instance judgment
Chuncheon District Court Decision 2011Guhap779 Decided June 5, 2012
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1. Purport of claim
On August 23, 2011, the defendant revoked the disposition for cancellation of consultation on construction and the disposition for refusal of commencement of construction, respectively, against the plaintiff.
2. Purport of appeal
The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
Reasons
The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is the same as that for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this Court’s explanation is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.
Judges Kim Jong-soo (Presiding Judge)