The defendant shall be innocent.

1. At around 22:10 on October 31, 2012, the Defendant discovered that the victim E, seated next to the instant bus in front of the C building in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, was divingd with a paper room under the bottom of the Defendant.

In addition, while getting down from a bus, the victim's market price was 300,000 won or more, and the victim's temporary theft was stolen.

2. Determination:

A. As stated in the facts charged, the Defendant consistently changed from the investigative agency to this court, that there is no room to bring the clothes of E, as indicated in the facts charged.

B. The burden of proof of criminal facts prosecuted in a criminal trial is that the prosecutor bears the burden of proof, and the conviction should be based on the evidence of probative value that makes the judge feel true beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, if there is no such evidence, the defendant is suspected to be guilty, even if there is no such evidence.

Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.

C. As stated in the facts charged in the instant case, there is only a statement in the E’s legal and investigative agency as evidence that the Defendant brought a paper door to E and brought a clothes equivalent to KRW 300,000 in the market price in the door.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, i.e., upon the loss of the above shopping bags, E was found before the said shopping bags were lost, but it was not possible to find it, and thus, reported to the police as theft. The police confirmed CCTV screen, which was installed on the above bus, by the police, that the Defendant, who was seated next to the above bus, was called the Defendant as the offender. However, this is the trend of E.