Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for eight months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, with the trade name of “E”, carried on the mobile phone hosting business, was leased by production lines from F Co., Ltd. to hosting mobile phone cases.

A person shall not employ a person who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities. On March 1, 2016, the defendant employed 12 foreigners who do not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities as shown in the attached Table of Crimes (1), such as having the Kakkhstan who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities after entering the office G or E (B-1) in the former City of America and 304, and having the Kakkhstan who had no status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities, such as entry into the status of visa exemption (B-1), work in the State F.

2. Defendant B, with the trade name of “I”, manufactured electronic parts by leasing a producerra from “F” to a person who engages in the electronic component manufacturing business.

On April 7, 2016, the Defendant employed 24 foreign nationals who do not have the status of stay to engage in job-seeking activities, such as employment of K (V-4-1) which is a foreigner of Sri Lankan nationality, and who does not have the status of stay to engage in job-seeking activities, at the I Office located in theJ of Busan-si, Busan-si. In addition, the Defendant employed 24 foreign nationals who do not have the status of stay to engage in job-seeking activities as shown in the attached crime list (2).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding L;

1. The police statement of M or N;

1. Each statement;

1. Each accusation;

1. Each immigration offender's written notice of review and decision, each written notice of employment of each alien, each immigration offender's comprehensive records and inquiry into records of each immigration offender, each list, each business registration certificate, and each contract;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (report on telephone conversations between a suspect and a suspect's counter-party telephone conversation);

1. Relevant Article 94 Subparag. 9 of the Immigration Control Act and Articles 18(3) of the same Act, each of which constitutes a crime; the Defendants’ choice of punishment;

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;