beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,500,00, Defendant B and C by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.
The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
The wife D and Defendant C’s wife conducted a business partnership on April 15, 2016, when starting the business of “H” on the first floor of the G-owned building located in F in Gyeonggi-si on April 15, 2016.
Defendant
A and Defendant C are customers in the above opening of business, and Defendant B participated in the above opening of business as customers.
1. Defendant A
A. On April 15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol at around 23:15, the victim G (the age of 41) found the above cosmetic shop and took a large sound, namely, “at the time she was sent to the her owner of the building, who was engaged in opening the cosmetic,” and “at the time she was sent to the her flusium,” and “at the flusium,” “at the flusium,” and “at the flusium of the Defendant’s flusium, she expressed the Defendant’s desire to read “at the flusium,” and she expressed the Defendant’s flusium that “at the flusium, she was flusiumed at the victim’s face, and sustained the victim’s flusium and the glusium of the glusium in need of medical treatment for about 14 days.
B. On the same day at around 23:30 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) arrested him as a flagrant offender from the police officer K of the Gyeonggi Police Station, who was called out after receiving G’s 112 report at the above cosmetics; and (b) thought that the police officer called out to the scene was able to find him in the opening rather than the end of the Defendant’s daily activity, and believed that he believed him to believe that he would have more trusted the Defendant’s statement of the Defendant who called out to the scene; and (c) provided the above K with the desire to read “I am the police officer, I am it, and w she was pushed at one time by hand.”
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.
2. Defendant B, at the time, at the time, and at the place described in Section 1.B, arrested Defendant A, who is the Defendant’s seat, as a flagrant offender, and left the Defendant’s shoulder by hand after the above K’s hand, who is likely to wear the k’s hand.
Accordingly, the defendant is about the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.