The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Although the summary of the grounds for appeal did not have insultd the victim by taking the victim’s desire, the court below found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case. In so doing, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court by comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, i.e., (1) the victim expressed the victim at the investigative agency and the lower court’s court.

consistently stated, ② At the present site,

D and F also, in investigative agencies and court of original instance, the defendant expressed a victim's desire at the victim.

In light of the fact that the defendant consistently stated his statement, ③ the defendant also recognized that he was in dispute with other convicted prisoners at the time of the crime of this case, and the defendant's statement to the effect that "the victim was aware of the defendant," and that it is reasonable to see that the defendant's statement to the effect that "the defendant was about the inside," and that it is about the victim who sworn the defendant, the defendant's statement to the effect that the defendant was about the victim who sworn the defendant, can sufficiently recognize the fact that

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.