The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the fact-finding) lies in the fact that the defendant did not transfer theization and voluntarily expressed a desire to do so, but the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case, although he did not wish the victims as shown in the facts charged. The court below erred by misapprehending the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by evidence duly adopted and examined by the judgment of the court below and the court below, that is, the victims have been present in the restaurant to get the victim E to move the vehicle by the victim's driver at the investigative agency and court of the court below. The defendant expressed the victim E face, and the defendant expressed the victim's desire to "I will see why I will see it, I will see it," and the defendant expressed the victim's desire to "I will see it, I will see it, I will see it, I will see it, I see it, I see it, I see it, I see it, I see it, I see it, I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I will am. I am. I do not speak. I will. I. I am...."

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit and Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not reasonable.