logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.11.08 2018고단1348
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by a fine of thirty million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 13, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to three years in prison at night by the Cheongju District Court due to intrusion on structures at night, larceny, etc. and completed the execution of the sentence on May 24, 2017.

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service of CA110 obbs, in violation of the Road Traffic Act (unnecessary measures after accidents), in violation of the Road Traffic Act, and in violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving);

On January 7, 2018, the Defendant, without obtaining a motor motor device bicycle license from around 15:17, 2018, proceeded in front of the small-dong Park 94, a 74-lane in the Cheongju-si, a significant Cheongju-si, with the front side of the Cheongju-dong Park from the south-do, the front side of the Cheongju-dong Park, the two-lanes between the two-lane.

In such cases, the driver had a duty of care to safely drive along the vehicle line by properly operating the steering wheel and the left and the left well and the left and the right of the driver and accurately operating the steering wheel and the brake system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not proceed along the lane but did not take necessary measures when a traffic accident occurs, such as immediately stopping, even though he did not immediately stop the vehicle, by taking the H-learning vehicle operated by the victim G in the signal waiting at the same lane due to the negligence that failed to properly operate the steering gear, which was driven by the victim G, into the left-hand part of the off-to-hand part of the above YA and damaged the above vehicle to be the repair cost of 686,400 won.

2. Although the owner of Obain in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Damages was prohibited from operating Obain which was not covered by mandatory insurance, the Defendant operated CA110 Oba, which was owned by the Defendant, at the time and place specified in the foregoing paragraph 1, and at the same time and place.

3. On July 2017, the Defendant violated the Automobile Management Act: (a) removed a registration number plate attached to I Flama, and then attached to the above CA110 Orala; and (b) operated CA110, which was owned by the Defendant, at the date and time and place indicated in the above paragraph (1).

Accordingly, the defendant has a car registration number plate.

arrow