Defendant

A Imprisonment for 10 months, each of the defendants B, C, D, and E shall be punished by imprisonment for 6 months.

except that this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

A Co., Ltd. I (hereinafter referred to as “I”) is a manufacturer and seller of wide-area pest control devices in the Asia-siJ, and Defendant A is a seller of the metropolitan pest control devices manufactured I in the name of “L” located in K in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si.

On the other hand, Defendant B is the representative of the NF group in the Chungcheong City, Defendant C is the representative of the PF group in Q in the Chungcheong City, and Defendant D is the representative of the RF group in Q in the Chungcheong City, Defendant E is the representative of the TF group in the Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, and U is the representative of the WFF group in the Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, and the above NF group, PF group, RF group, TF group, and WF group are the representatives of the WFF group in the Chungcheong City, and U is the representatives of the WFF group in the Chungcheongnam-si, the above NF group, the PF group, the RF group, the TF group, and the WF group are each selected as the subsidized business entity of the “PF group support project” (hereinafter “instant project”).

1. When Defendant A entered into a metropolitan pest control program supply contract with the above subsidized project operators, Defendant A entered into a contract with subsidized project operators who are not capable of paying self-charges on condition that they will fully or partially refund all or some of the subsidized project operators (a total project cost equivalent to 30%). Based on this, Defendant A conspired to obtain subsidies from the representatives of the above subsidized project operators and victims.

around March 2012, the Defendant confirmed the fact that the WT was selected as a subsidized project operator of the instant project, and around April 2012, the Defendant sent U U U, 37 million won out of the amount of 39.6 million won (total project cost of KRW 132 million) to be paid by the said WT to be returned in cash from the end of 2012 to the end of 2012, and supplied I with I’s wide-area prevention devices to the said WT.

U Accordingly, around May 15, 2012, at the V-Myeon Office located in the above V, conceals the fact that the Defendant paid self-charges to the third party, as seen above, and assumes the documents as if the said W-based Agriculture Association actually bears the self-charges.