logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.07.21 2016나56103
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On October 12, 2012, the Plaintiff received a written complaint (hereinafter “instant complaint”) from the B police station on the grounds that the Defendant C, a defendant, committed a crime of boundary and insult.

B. On December 17, 2012, B police station investigation and an assistant assistant D belonging to an economic team investigation into the instant complaint, and sent the case to Busan District Prosecutor’s Office without prosecution only to the insult portion. On December 26, 2012, the prosecutor of the Busan District Prosecutor’s Office issued a non-prosecution disposition with no suspicion on the insult portion, and notified the Plaintiff thereof.

C. On April 24, 2013, the Plaintiff submitted to the commissioner of the Busan Metropolitan City Police Agency (hereinafter “the Superintendent of the Police Agency”) with respect to slope D on the ground that he/she intentionally neglected to investigate the part of the boundary line among the instant complaints, and, on the ground that he/she neglected to examine the record of transfer, and obtained approval with respect to B police station investigation and its affiliated E and the Busan F, without neglecting to examine the part of the above lower court’s omission, and submitted a petition with respect to B police station hearing auditors and auditors, on the ground that he/she did not properly state the misconduct committed by the above relevant persons (hereinafter “the instant petition”).

On July 15, 2013, after investigating the instant petition, the Commissioner General of the Korean National Police Agency issued a notice of the result of the civil petition treatment (hereinafter “the notice of the result of the instant civil petition treatment”) to the effect that the Plaintiff took each measure against the Plaintiff, “a warning” against the Plaintiff, “the caution” against the mitigated E, and “the rest of four” (hereinafter “the notice of the result of the instant civil petition treatment”).

E. On October 7, 2013, pursuant to the Official Information Disclosure Act by the Commissioner General of the Korean National Police Agency, the Plaintiff’s statement related to the instant petition and the written statement or the written statement of the respondent (hereinafter referred to as D) and the written statement of E, F, G, H, and I are combined.

arrow