Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 27, 2017, the Defendant partially revised the facts charged to the extent that it does not have any substantial disadvantage to the Defendants’ exercise of their right of defense. A. The Defendant was under the influence of alcohol of 0.148% of blood alcohol content on December 27, 2017, and was driving a mixed-type vehicle with C, while driving a vehicle at around 0.148% of alcohol content, and driving four lanes in front of D in front of D during the game in the middle of the city in the middle of the city in the middle of the city in the middle of the city in which he was negligent in performing the three-lane of the road in the middle of the city in the middle of the city in the middle of the city in which he was negligent in performing his duty of front-time navigation by negligence in the course of his occupational negligence, thereby resulting in the victim E (n) driving the vehicle in F, the back part of the vehicle in front of the said C, and caused the victim to suffer the fright of the bones in need of approximately two weeks treatment.

As a result, the defendant was driving a motor vehicle in a situation where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, thereby causing the injury of people.

2. On December 31, 2017, Defendant B: (a) knew of the fact at a transportation criminal investigation office at a police station office located in the inside and outside of the Games during the period of the Gyeonggi-si, which was located in the Republic of Korea; (b) while driving under the influence of alcohol by A as described in paragraph (1), the Defendant made a false statement to a police officer in charge of transportation criminal investigation who was in charge of the police station during the period of the investigation of the instant case, as if the Defendant had caused a traffic accident, thereby allowing the person who committed a crime equivalent to or heavier

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Each protocol of examination of the defendant B (limited to the defendant B)

1. G statements;

1. Investigation report (the statement, etc. of the shootings);

1. Reports on the occurrence of each traffic accident;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employer-employed driver and the circumstantial report of the employer-employed driver;

1. Photographs photographs, such as the scene of the traffic accident, and photographs of suspects;

1. Closed-circuit outputs (Evidence Nos. 13);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. The pertinent Article of the Criminal Act and the Defendant A who choose a sentence regarding the crime: the former specific crime.