The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the defendant is the head of the C church located in B at the time of racing, and the above C church is divided due to the dispute between D pastors and the heads of the roads. The defendant is a new letter that follows the above heads, and the victim E is a new letter that follows the pastors.

On April 19, 2015, at around 12:30, the Defendant demanded the victim to leave the office in the first floor class of the C church, where there is a woman with no name, while requesting the victim to leave the office in dispute with the victim, but the victim refused to leave the office. However, the victim’s refusal to leave the office should not be called “nicking with a woman.” The father did not go to the same place as a human being.

low-quality

C. The victim openly insultingd the victim by openly speaking as “Isn't know if Isn't know the church.”

2. Determination and conclusion

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

(b) Offenses subject to prosecution upon complaint: Article 312 (1) of the Criminal Act;

(c) Submission of a statement of withdrawal of complaint on July 28, 2016 by the victim;

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act;