beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years, and for one year and six months, respectively.
except that from the date of this judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
From around 2006, the Defendants began to live together and reported the marriage in 201. From June 2012, the Defendants resided with Defendant B’s children in the Daegu Suwon-gu E apartment (F (F) and with G (B) who is his father (B).
1. Abuse by means of taking the victim F from a postmortem examination into consideration;
A. Defendant A’s violation of the Child Welfare Act (Habitual child abuse) and the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Habitual collectives, deadly weapons, etc.) committed an act of abuse by Defendant A, from June 2012 to December 2013, 2013, in which the victim F was unable to listen well to the Defendant’s horses at least two to three times a week from E apartment, without any specific reason, and the victim F was in the body of the victim by taking a postmortem examination, which is a dangerous object, while habitually damaging the victim’s body at the time of a number of times when the parts of the body of the victim’s arms, hairs, and shoulders, which are habitually dangerous objects, and assault the victim.
B. Defendant B’s violation of the Child Welfare Act (Habitual child abuse) and the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (Habitual collectives, deadly weapons, etc.) were committed by the Defendant in violation of Article 1(a) and the time, place, and under the above circumstances, the father of the Victim F, who was the father of the Victim F, took necessary measures to protect the victim, such as prohibiting the victim’s body punishment or isolation the victim from the victim, etc., and demanding the victim to stop any abuse against the victim, despite the legal duty to protect the victim, even though he/she was well aware of the above circumstances, thereby aiding and abetting the victim against the violation of the Child Welfare Act (Habitual abuse) and the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (abbruptedly collectives, deadly weapons, etc.).
2. Abuse by the method of causing victims to G in the entrance;
A. Defendant A’s violation of the Child Welfare Act (child abuse) was married that Defendant A used a victim G’s Handphone in E apartment around a short time around 2014.