logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2014.08.26 2014고정409
사행행위등규제및처벌특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

When anyone intends to operate a speculative business, he/she shall be equipped with facilities and speculative instruments prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Public Administration and Security for each type of business and obtain permission therefor from the commissioner of

Nevertheless, the defendant from around 15:00 on March 24, 2014 to the same year.

4. From December 19:35, in the original city B (C and underground 1st floor) D indoor fishing place, the head of the competent district police agency, without obtaining permission from customers and let them fish with an admission fee of 10,000 won per hour. The head of the competent district police agency provided premiums (such as gas stations equivalent to 100,000 won, rice 20 km, etc.) indicated in the tag of the tag by attaching a tag on some water surface, and the customer conducted speculative activities by measuring the weight of the body of the body of the body of the body of the customer, and then, the customer conducted speculative activities by providing free gifts (e.g., electronic sirens and gas stations equivalent to 100,000 won) according to weight.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (field conditions, etc.);

1. Article 30 (2) 1 and Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Regulation and Punishment of Specific Crimes concerning Relevant Acts and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc.

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, including the background of the instant case, the degree of recognition of the illegality of the Defendant, the equity between the sentencing of similar cases, etc.

arrow