beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of one year and four months.
An applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.
In the case of "2017 Highest 5907".
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
【Criminal Records, etc.】 On November 17, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and four months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Suwon District Court House, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 16, 2017, and was working as a clerical assistant at the G Authorized Brokerage Office located in Masung City F.
【Criminal facts】 2017 Highest 2060
1. The defrauded E leased the apartment owned by the Defendant at Ansan-si, H apartment No. 108 501.
On March 2009, the Defendant, at the above G Official Brokerage Office, sent a phone call to the victim, must conclude a contract with the victim or become a director because he/she sold his/her house.
The Dogner I apartment house 205, 406, is a relative house, and the former has been sealed.
“Along with the fact that the Defendant was delegated the authority to conclude the lease contract from the owner of the above I apartment, the Defendant made a false representation.
Around that time, the victim entered into a lease contract with the defendant for the rent of KRW 30 million for the rent of KRW 40 million for the above I apartment 205 Dong 406, and entered into a contract for the rent of KRW 10 million for the rent of KRW 20 million for the above I apartment 205 Dong and KRW 406, May 14, 2015, respectively, and as a result, the victim entered into a lease contract for the rent of KRW 60 million for the rent of KRW 40 million for the total amount of KRW 60 million for four times on May 14, 2015.
However, in fact, the defendant did not have been delegated by the J with the authority to conclude the lease contract from the owner of the above I Apartment Building No. 205, 406, and therefore, he was not duly authorized to conclude the lease contract on his behalf. In addition, the defendant did not have any property at the time and did not have any intent or ability to return the deposit to the victim.
As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received a total of KRW 60 million from the victim four times.
"2017 Highest 5820"
2. On August 31, 2010, the Defendant against K’s fraud.