logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.10.26 2016고단4451
업무상횡령등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant 2016 Highest 4451 is a person who is engaged in the duties, such as lease contract brokerage, while operating a "F Authorized Broker" office on the first floor of the building of Ansan-si E in Ansan-si.

On May 25, 2016, the Defendant received transfer of KRW 10 million,00,000,000,000,000 to the national bank account in the name of the Defendant (I), and embezzled KRW 65 million, including KRW 30,000,000,000 on May 27, 2015, and KRW 65,5,000,000,00,000, in the course of performing duties for the victim, from the victim G who wants to deposit the above F building 620 to the lessor H on the same day upon request from the lessor who wants to deliver the lease deposit from the said F building 620 to the lessor.

The defendant 2017 Highest 700 is an authorized broker as the operator of the F Authorized Brokerage Office in Ansan-si E.

1. On September 20, 2014, the Defendant may lease KRW 1013 to the Victim K who visited to rent the said officetel, using the fact that the owner J was delegated with the authority to enter into a contract with the effect that, with respect to KRW 5 million and KRW 4,50,000,000,000,000 for a monthly rent of KRW 5 million and KRW 4,50,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000).

“Falsely speaking,” and concluded a charter contract with the victim for KRW 60 million with respect to the instant officetel 1013.

However, in fact, as the defendant is engaged in the real estate brokerage business, is liable for personal debts equivalent to KRW 70 million, he received the deposit from the injured party and explained to the above J as if the monthly rent contract was concluded, and used the difference in the deposit amount of KRW 50 million to pay the above personal debts.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and thereby, is the deposit money of the above officetel transfer from the victim to the national bank account (I) in the name of the defendant.

arrow