logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.01.17 2013고합294
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four years and by imprisonment for one year and six months.

However, the defendant B is subject to objection.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2013 Gohap294, 569"

1. Defendant A

A. The Defendant of the joint criminal conduct with E is a person who sells another person’s personal information (name and resident registration number) and his/her identification card to a mobile phone dealer, etc., and E is a person who has operated “I”, which is a mobile phone sales store by employing G and H from the Daegu Seo-gu F.

Around May 2012, when the Defendant and E deliver to E a copy of another person’s personal information list and identification card secured by the Defendant from an illegal sales organization, the Defendant and E used another person’s personal information, which the Defendant obtained from the Defendant, to open a mobile phone from the communications company, and then sell the mobile phone, and then deliver approximately KRW 400,000 out of the sales price of one mobile phone to the Defendant as the above personal information list and identification card purchase price, and the remainder was offered to acquire E.

1. On May 22, 2012, the Defendant forging Private Document Forgery and the display of the above investigation document, at his own office located in the Daegu Suwon-gu J, Daegu-gu, issued a copy of the list and the identification card of the K, which recorded the identity of the K secured by the above method, to E via the Internet Nition Port, and Eul issued a copy of the K’s personal information and identification card issued by the Defendant at the above “I” office to H et al., and had H et al. enter the contents of the “L and the customer address column” in the “L and the customer address column,” and sign the “L and the customer address column,” and continuously forged one copy of the application for the mobile phone purchase in the name of the K, and as if the application for the above forged application was duly concluded, it was a document agent that had the employee, etc. enter the same place.

arrow