The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that all of the facts charged in this case was guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not exhaust all necessary deliberations, but did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical

On the other hand, a written judgment is signed and sealed by the judge (Article 41 of the Criminal Procedure Act), but it is not necessary to affix the signature and seal of the judge to the copy of the judgment

(See Supreme Court Decision 2007Do3060 Decided June 28, 2007). Therefore, we cannot accept the allegation in the grounds of appeal that the lower court erred by omitting the signature and seal of the judge on a different premise.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.