The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the court of first instance, the court below’s determination that the charged facts of this case was guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning is just, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, by exceeding the bounds of the principle of proportionality, by misapprehending the legal principles on the calculation of damages in the crime of causing property damage, and by misapprehending the legal principles on

In addition, a written judgment is signed and sealed by the judge (Article 41 of the Criminal Procedure Act), but it is not necessary to affix the signature and seal of the judge to the copy of the judgment delivered to

(See Supreme Court Decision 2007Do3060 Decided June 28, 2007). Therefore, we cannot accept the allegation in the grounds of appeal that the first instance court and the lower judgment omitted the judge’s signature and seal on a different premise.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.