logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2016.05.27 2015고단1127
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around July 4, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement stating that “Around July 4, 2015, the Defendant would make profits from two to three times the principal amount to the victim D through the resale, such as the apartment-band-band-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-gand-

However, even if the defendant received investment from the injured party, he was thought to use it as operating funds of the company operated by the husband of the defendant, and it was clear that the agreed profit was made through the resale of apartment sale right, and there was no particular property or income, so there was no intention or ability to pay the agreed profit even if he received investment from the injured party.

As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 2,530,940 from the victim to the new bank account under the name of the Defendant; (b) and (c) from around that time to November 29, 2014, transferred KRW 642,688,940 in total over 40 times from the victims (nine persons) as shown in the crime list as shown in the attached crime list.

Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victims and received property.

On March 2015, 2015, the Defendant stated that “The 2016 Highest 194 Defendant purchased land from the victim G to the North Korean Hospital located in Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si, Gunnsan-si, and made a false statement that “If the former North Korean Hospital was made to enter, if it made an investment, it would buy the land near the former North Korean Hospital, and would make twice the investment money.”

However, the Defendant had a debt amounting to approximately KRW 700 million, and there was no other property or income, so even if he received investment money from the injured party, he did not have the intent or ability to pay the profits to the injured party by purchasing the land.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and thereby deceivings the victim, the defendant under the name of the defendant No. 16, March 16, 2015.

arrow