beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. C apartment fraud Defendant is an investment in the Defendant’s house located in Sejong-si around August 12, 2013, in which the victim purchased KRW 12,00,00,000 from Sejong-si apartment house C, 201, 817, and 12,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000).
It is now 2-300,000 won now.
“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”
However, at the time of the instant case, the premium of the apartment unit in question had a large volume of KRW 4 million, and the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant could earn profits by making an investment in the same form as above to a person who is not qualified as a certified intermediary, and that some of the amount received from the injured party would be used for personal purposes. As such, even if he received money from the injured party, he did not have the intent or ability to pay the principal and the profits that he promised to make by investing in the said apartment unit in full, even if he received money from the injured party.
As above, the defendant deceivings the victim and transferred 12 million won to the account (E) in the name of the defendant in the name of the NongHyup Bank under the name of the defendant on the same day from the victim, and acquired money by remittance of 307,000 won as the price for management expenses to the same account on August 13, 2013.
2. On October 6, 2013, the F apartment-related fraud Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “the first invested apartment price has increased” to the victim through the Defendant’s married G with the intent that “the first invested apartment price has increased. It is a good thing to be invested in this place. It is possible to impose a larger amount of money on the victim as much as the average number of money has increased.”
However, in fact, the defendant was only aware of the fact that he could make an investment in the above form to a person who is not qualified as a certified broker, and some of the defendants received money from the victim.