logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.12.06 2017고정2907
자동차손해배상보장법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case was that the Defendant owned B New Airport and operated the said car without having subscribed to mandatory insurance at approximately 120 km from the front of the Jeju Apartment-ro 124, Taecheon-si, Mancheon-ro, 11:40 on August 12, 2017 to the front road of the Jeju New Airport Oil station in the Namyang-si, 957, to the front road of the Namyang Seoyang-si, 120 km.

2. According to the records, C (the Defendant’s children) who is the owner of the said passenger vehicle, paid KRW 102,520 to the Korea Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. at around 09:48 on August 12, 2017, with KRW 102,520 of the premium, and purchased a mandatory insurance policy on the said passenger vehicle (the insurance period from August 12, 2017 to September 12, 2017). The Defendant was under the control of the police officer at around 11:40 on the same day after hearing the above fact from C, and was found to have not been covered by the mandatory insurance at the time. However, the fact that the said passenger vehicle was delayed entering computerized data on the part of the Korea Marine Insurance Co., Ltd., Ltd. at the time, but the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone alone was insufficient or intentional to operate the said passenger vehicle at the time.

It is insufficient to view it, and there is no evidence to acknowledge it.

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime and thus, a judgment of innocence is rendered after the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow