logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.01.12 2016고단2075
상해
Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On November 17, 2015, the Defendant: (a) brought an injury to the victim A (44 years) who was a visiting learning teacher of the Defendant’s children at his own residence located in Gyeyang-gu E building No. 105 Dong-gu, Gyeyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, 105, and 301 on November 17, 2015; (b) brought an injury to the victim, such as fluoral salt, etc. requiring medical treatment for about 14 days, by taking out the victim’s chest, fluore, fluor, fluor, fluor, etc.

B. Defendant A got out of the victim B(40) at the above date, time, and place as seen above, but was removed from the victim, Defendant A caused the victim’s injury by hand, such as duplicating the victim’s arms, and supkeing the ebbbage, etc., which requires treatment for approximately 21 days.

2. As evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case against Defendant B, Defendant A’s statements, written diagnosis of injury, and written examination and treatment records (A) are located in this court and investigative agency, and Defendant B’s statements, written diagnosis of injury, written diagnosis of injury (Evidence No. 2, No. 38, No. 40), and written examination of injury (Evidence No. 2, No. 38, No. 40), are located as evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case against Defendant A.

However, the witness F, who is a police officer dispatched to the site at the time, testified in this Court, 112 reported (the summary of this case - the fraud of this case and the conclusion of guidance to submit a petition for termination matters - counseling guidance, and fraud damage), the date of issuance of a written diagnosis of injury (each November 18, 2015, and November 21, 2015), the fact that the injury diagnosis or treatment record itself is an clinical presumption dependent on the patient's statement, the fact that the injury diagnosis or treatment record per se of B was caused by the water treatment of the complainant, conflicts between the Defendants at the time of being known by the record, the investigation agency, and the Defendants.

arrow