logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2017.05.31 2016고정464
상해
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant received a non-fluent certificate from the victim C (73 tax, south) on the ground that the Defendant illegally dried the fish net, which was installed on the river side of the previous river on August 1, 2016, set up in the vicinity of a small river located on the south-si, Namcheon-si, Namcheon-si, Namcheon-si, Busan, on August 1, 2016, for the following reasons: (b) whether he/she would be in the Republic of Korea; (c)

I would like to report to Chewing strings

“At the hearing of the bath theory of “,” the victim was in conflict with each other, and “I am gue gue gue gue gue gue gue gue gue gue

Does 20,000 won not to be granted

"Preaming the victim's chest, the victim's chest was fluored once by drinking, and the victim's fluoral damage was caused by fluoral damage that requires treatment for about 20 days by head.

2. C’s statement that is admitted as evidence corresponding to the facts charged in the instant case (C was investigated by the Chuncheon Police Station on August 6, 2016, and the Defendant was drinking the victim’s breast at one time and pushed the victim’s breast due to her head.

On August 8, 2016, this court stated to the same effect in this court, there are diagnosis certificates with respect to J. C, C’s photographs on the part of the injury, treatment records, hospital expenses settlement records, etc.

However, the following circumstances, which can be recognized by the witness D and E’s respective legal statements, arrest report of the case, investigation report, dispatch report of the scene, report of the case, the relevant photo and the diagnosis report of the case, records of diagnosis and treatment, and the details of settlement of hospital expenses, are as follows: ① The police officer called up immediately after the instant case only stated that “A made a threat to the defendant as he would be able to take a bath at the time” by the defendant; ② The arrest report of the case was made and the investigation report did not contain the statement about the fact that the defendant assaulted C; ② The arrest report of the case was made and the investigation report was not written; ③ the photograph of the victim of the instant case was taken immediately after the instant case; ④ D was present at this court and was sealed only by only one person.

See the purport that “ was talked.”

arrow