logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.03.14 2017고정312
폐기물관리법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 12,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is an in-house director of corporation B in the former North Korea-si E, and the defendant corporation B is a corporation established for the intermediate recycling of wastes.

1. A person discharging industrial wastes shall dispose of wastes directly generated from his/her place of business, or entrust the disposal to a person who has obtained permission for his/her waste disposal business, a reporter of waste disposal, or a person who installs and operates

On November 21, 2011, the Defendant brought in a chemical substance shop located in E, F, G, H, I, and J, etc., which was discharged from the former North Korea, and made an interim recycling process by means of crushing and crushing after mixing it with dust, and then produced the product, and discharged the remainder of waste gas to the current environment (e.g., current environment).

However, waste gas stations discharged through the above process are waste gas stations which are mixed with waste gas stations, and thus, they cannot be treated in the current environment (e.g., waste gas stations) permitted to handle only waste gas stations, but they cannot be treated in such environment (e.g., waste collection and transportation business entity). However, the Defendant used to transport waste gas stations 25,800 g of waste gas stations mixed with chemical substances in the current environment (e.g., waste gas stations) through the waste collection and transportation business entity, to transport waste gas stations 25,800 g of waste gas stations which are mixed with chemical substances in the current environment (e.g., waste gas stations) through the waste collection and transportation business entity.

From that time until September 10, 2015, the Defendant dealt with a total of approximately KRW 6,520,850 gs and a total of approximately KRW 6,520,850 gs through the same method as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes, and the Defendant did not obtain permission to dispose of the chemical shop of waste.

2. The Defendant Company B caused A to commit an act of violation as described in paragraph 1 at the time and place mentioned in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A report on investigation (report on the progress of collection of samples from B wastes);

1. General waste recycling business licenses, etc. (waste license certificate - 175 pages for investigation records), respectively.

arrow