logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.09.30 2015가합2838
추심금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. Of the costs of lawsuit, the part pertaining to the participation in the litigation is the intervenor joining the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On November 17, 2014, among the Plaintiff’s Intervenor and the Plaintiff’s Intervenor and the Plaintiff’s Middle-gu Co., Ltd., concluded an entrusted service contract with the following contents to collect, transport, and dispose of construction waste at the five lots of land, including Seoul, Nam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City D Removal and E-Newly constructed construction sites for apartment buildings (hereinafter “instant service contract”).

2. Discharge place: Five parcels, such as Gwangju Metropolitan City C, etc.; and

3. Kind and nature of wastes: Construction waste and solid prize;

4. Places of transport and disposal: The F.S.F. M.C. in the Jeon-Nam-gun.

5. Treatment methods: Intermediate treatment (production of recycled aggregates, etc. by crushing, crushing, separating, or screening them).

7. The term of the consignment contract: The actual processing volume of the payment shall be settled from October 1, 2014 to December 30, 2016.

9. The plaintiff, the consignee, and the consignee, the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the consignee, the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the consignee, the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the consignee, the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the consignee, the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the consignee, the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the consignee, the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the consignee, the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the consignee, the plaintiff, in relation to the plaintiff's 1,00,000 ton of the construction waste and the service (the unit cost of the cost, the unit cost of the waste (the unit of the cost, the quantity of which x 22,000,000 metric tons of the transport cost x 70,000 metric tons of the construction waste mixed with the transport cost x 1,672,00,000 metric tons of the construction waste x 10,000,000 metric tons of the construction waste x 10,000,00

B. On March 9, 2015, the Plaintiff was issued a seizure and collection order (hereinafter “the instant collection order”) with respect to the amount until the claim amount is KRW 350,247,300, out of the amount of the service charges that the Plaintiff would receive from the Defendant, based on the authentic copy of the notarial deed with the executory power of No. 1383, 2013, issued by the Ghap Office against the Plaintiff’s Intervenor, as the Plaintiff’s Intervenor, the third obligor as the Defendant, and issued the seizure and collection order (hereinafter “instant collection order”), and the order is issued.

arrow