1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. Of the costs of appeal, the part pertaining to the participation in the appeal shall be the intervenor joining the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff’s Intervenor, the Plaintiff’s Intervenor, and the Defendant’s Heavy Industries Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “SP”) contracted the waste disposal services at the following construction site from the Defendant’s Heavy Industries Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “SP”)

On November 17, 2014, the Seoul Metropolitan Government concluded an entrusted service contract (hereinafter “instant service contract”) with the following contents concerning the removal of the Gu office buildings and the collection, transportation, and disposal of construction waste generated at the construction site of the E apartment building located outside Seoul Metropolitan City, Seoul Metropolitan City, and five lots of land:

2. Discharge place: Nam-gu Seoul and five parcels; and

3. Kind and nature of wastes: Construction waste and solid prize;

4. The place of transportation and disposal: the supplementary intervenor to the plaintiff, who shall be the plaintiff, who shall not participate in the Fari-gun Fari-gun F.

5. Treatment methods: Intermediate treatment (production of recycled aggregates, etc. by crushing, crushing, separating, or screening them).

7. The term of the consignment contract: The actual processing volume of the payment shall be settled from October 1, 2014 to December 30, 2016.

9. The amount of the entrusted volume and the amount of services determined for the collection and transportation of the unit (e.g., the unit cost) of each kind of waste (e.g. the quantity x the unit cost).

(hereinafter the same shall apply)

The plaintiff's supplementary intervenor (the plaintiff's supplementary intervenor) among the co-trustee (the collector) corporation of the defendant Co., Ltd. (the collector) shall be the plaintiff's supplementary intervenor to the 22,000 metric tons of construction waste 22,000 6,000 70,000 metric tons of waste concrete 10,000 metric tons of construction waste 10,000 metric tons of 10,000 15,000 15,000,000 waste metric tons of 200 1,752,000,000 metric tons of 1,752,00,000 metric tons of 200 metric tons of waste waste 10,000 metric tons of 15,000 15,000 0,000

B. On December 9, 2014, the Plaintiff’s Intervenor and the Defendant agreed that the unit disposal cost per ton of construction waste shall be KRW 41,000 (including transportation expenses) and the unit disposal cost per ton of other wastes shall be KRW 25,000 (including transportation expenses).

C. On January 15, 2015, the Plaintiff’s Intervenor and I against the Defendant of the Plaintiff’s Intervenor.