Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 4,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 300,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are between the three-party employees who are engaged in the work of screening along with the F in Sam-si, E.

1. 피고인 A( 상해) 피고인은 2016. 4. 8. 17:20 경 태백시 G에 있는 ‘H’ 펜 션 앞에서 일을 마치고 직장 동료인 I의 J 차량 뒷좌석에 탑승하여 퇴근하던 중 피해자 B( 여, 61세) 이 피고인의 흉을 보았다는 이유로 화가 나 피해자와 서로 다투다가 양손으로 피해자의 머리채를 잡아 흔들고, 발로 피해자의 가슴 부위를 1회 걷어찼다.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as scarkeing a scarke that needs to be treated for about four weeks.

2. Defendant B (Assault) was dissatisfied with the victim A, as described in paragraph (1), at the time, and at the place described in paragraph (1). Defendant B (Assaults) was in favor of the victim, and the victim was in favor of the victim’s head debt by hand, with the defect of the appearance of the body.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The witness K and Dong name, and the witness K to be distinguished from the defendant A and the witness K to be divided into the defendant A are called "K (M)";

I, each legal statement of L

1. Each complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; selection of fines

B. Defendant B: Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act; selection of fines

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the allegations by the Defendants and their defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of each of the Criminal Procedure Act in the provisional payment order

1. Defendant A and his defense counsel asserted to the effect that he did not consent to B. Thus, the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, namely, K (M) in the vehicle operated by I, i.e., K (M) in the chief officer, L in the back seat, Defendant A in the middle of the back seat, and B in the back seat of the driver’s seat, and B in the investigation agency.