Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, as to the Defendants, the period of one year from the day when this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are both nests.

1. On April 4, 2016, Defendant B: (a) around 15:07, the Defendant: (b) carried out the pentthy road in front of the Fpentthy in the wife population E; (c) on the road before the victim A (e.g., 61 years old); (d) carried out the chilling of trees in front of the instant pentthy road before the instant penthy; (d) carried the stone, which is a dangerous thing, and (e) carried out the chilling back to the above victim; and (e) carried out the left hand, which requires the victim to take approximately two weeks of treatment in accordance with the victim’s left hand, etc.

2. Defendant A, at the same time, at a place as set forth in paragraph (1) of the above paragraph, was inflicted an injury on the victim, by cutting the stones, which are dangerous objects, to the victim B (the age of 61) for the foregoing reason, and cutting off several times to the victim, resulting in an injury, such as the mouth at the bottom of the left aggregate, which requires approximately four weeks of treatment, in line with the victim’s left hand hand part, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the said Act for mitigation of a small amount of punishment (the following favorable circumstances):

1. Article 62(1) (The following favorable circumstances) of the Criminal Act under the suspended sentence (Article 62(1)) of the same Act

We do not recognize that the Defendants were not in danger of Defendant A’s medical care, and do not accept the claim that Defendant A’s medical care was not a dangerous article). The Defendants, on the grounds of sentencing, carried the stones, which are dangerous articles, and inflicted an injury upon the other party; the Defendants recognized the facts of the instant crime; the Defendants did not want punishment between the two parties; and other consideration of the Defendants’ relationship.