beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On April 21, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 01:25, 2015, around 01:25, 2015, the victim D, working for Jung-gu Busan Metropolitan City, put the victim into the “E”, which was in possession of the victim who was in possession of the display stand, with a cresh can amounting to KRW 6,400, the market price of the four market price of the city string cans of the city string cans of the city string, KRW 8,00,000, KRW 4,200, and KRW 1,980,00, and KRW 26,00,00, at the market price of Jung-gu, Busan Metropolitan City.
On May 26, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 21:09, the 2015 Man-Ma3829, the Defendant: (b) placed the materials worth KRW 33,100,00, total market price, such as 33,10,00, in the display stand, in a cresh in which the management of the victim H, an employee, was neglected; (c) six Gangwon-do Toys; (d) two packages of Gangwon-do; (d) one carving; (e) one carving; and (e) one car refining, and (e) one car refining.
around 22:15 on August 17, 2015, the Defendant, “2015 Highest 5637, the Defendant, at around 22:15, 2015, stolen one set of 3,700 won at the market price owned by the victim J, Inc., a corporation with the first floor of Busan Seo-gu I, Busan, with his employees, displayed bad gaps in accordance with the customer’s response.
Summary of Evidence
"2015 Highest 2942"
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement made to D by the police;
1. Receipts:
1. Photographs "2015 Highest 3829";
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. A H statement;
1. Photographs of damaged articles 2015No5637;
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. The police statement of K;
1. Lritten statements;
1. Investigation report (CCTV investigation);
1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;
1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes;
1. As to the Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion regarding concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes, the Defendant and the defense counsel asserted that they were under the influence of alcohol at the time of each of the instant crimes, or that they were in a state of mental disability due to mental illness, and thus,