A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 17, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the duties of the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol in the D cafeteria managed by the Victim C (Y, 44 years of age) in Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s management of the victim’s restaurant by: (b) obstructing customers who wish to enter the restaurant by avoiding disturbance from entering the restaurant, she talked with the knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, and knife knife with the reported knife in 112.

2. On November 17, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the foregoing place, “A customer frighting to drink” was asked to return home from F for the guard of the police box sent out after receiving a report 112 on November 17, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s prevention and suppression of the crime, and legitimate execution of duties regarding the treatment of civil petition reports, by assaulting the F, such as frighting the frighten, frighting the fat, and frighting the fat, and frighting the fat, frighting the fat, thereby obstructing the police officer’s duty.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. A written statement of C and F;

1. G self-statements;

1. A report on investigation;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 316(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. Consideration, such as assaulting a police officer, who is performing official duties for the reason of sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act by aggravation of concurrent crimes, is not good in the nature of the crime, failing to be agreed with the victim, and not exceeding ten times the record of violent crimes, etc.