logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.10.20 2017고단2017
강제추행등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months;

2.Provided, That the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Compulsory indecent acts;

A. On February 20, 2017, the Defendant committed an indecent act on February 20, 2017, at the entrance of the victim E (Gain, Gain, 68 years old) who is the owner of the business at the seat of the first floor located in Gwangju Dong-gu, Gwangju, in line with the victim E (Gain, Gain, and 68 years old)’s humbly and forced to wear the victim to the right.

B. On February 25, 2017, the Defendant committed the crime committed on February 25, 2017: (a) 18:00 around February 25, 2017, she saw the victim, and committed an indecent act by force against the victim by using the two chests in front of the above telecomter.

(c)

On March 29, 2017, the Defendant committed the crime, around 18:00 on March 29, 2017, committed an indecent act by coercioning the victim by committing an act against the victim’s sexual flag with his/her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

2. On April 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 18:45, on the alleys located in the pelel, the Defendant tried to have the pelbage of the victim E, and (b) the victim prevented himself; and (c) the victim saw him/her on his/her left hand, and (d) strokeed him/her with the victim’s chest.

Summary of Evidence

1. The statement protocol and statement protocol of each police with respect to E (tentatively named);

1. Voluntary accompanying reports and investigation reports (in cases of indecent acts by force), which is denied that the defendant and his/her defense counsel did not commit each crime identical to the facts stated in the judgment.

However, in a case where the victim’s statement is generally consistent and consistent with the facts charged, it shall not be rejected without permission, unless there is any separate evidence to deem that the victim’s statement is objectively acceptable from an objective perspective (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2012Do2631, Jun. 28, 2012; 2007Do10728, Mar. 14, 2008). The victim made a concrete and consistent statement to the extent that it is impossible for the victim to take account of each indecent act and assault, such as the facts charged in the investigation agency, and the previous and subsequent circumstances, unless he/she directly experienced.

arrow