(a) If a person fails to move his/her resident registration while moving to a neighboring address;

(b) The case holding that service on the inmate was lawful;

(a) If a person on whom a service was made has directors at a neighboring address at the previous domicile, but has gone through both houses while living together with his/her resident registration at the previous domicile, all of them shall be the service place;

(b) The case holding that service on the inmate was lawful;

A. Article 170 of the Civil Procedure Act

Plaintiff

Defendant

Seoul High Court Decision 86Na2007 Decided March 3, 1987

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

We examine the grounds of appeal.

A recipient of the judgment of the court below is entitled to receive the original copy of the judgment of the court of first instance from August 1984 to the defendant's own child living together with the above defendant's new address, and if both parties living together with the defendant's family living together with the defendant's family living together with the defendant's family living together with the defendant's family living together with his family living together with his previous domicile at the previous domicile, they are service places. As duly established by the court below, the defendant living in Yeongdeungpo-gu ( Address 1 omitted) around August 16, 1985, and a director living together with his family living together with ( Address 2 omitted) around July 30, 1986, and the defendant living together with his family living together with his family living together with his family living together with his family living together with his family living together with his previous domicile, and the non-party who received the original copy of the judgment of the court of first instance to whom the judgment of this case had been delivered to the defendant's previous domicile was lawful as well as the judgment of this case's final appeal.

Justices Lee Lee-hee (Presiding Justice)