1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Basic Facts

The defendant is a local government that manages and operates a swimming pool in the F Building in Guri-si (hereinafter referred to as “instant swimming pool”) and is the non-party G user who is an instructor belonging to the instant swimming pool.

Plaintiff

A is a person who took a swimming training course from July 2, 2014 to "three times a week" in the swimming pool of this case, and Plaintiff B is the husband, Plaintiff C, D, and E of Plaintiff A.

The course classification of the swimming pool in this case and the swimming pool in this case are classified into the basic class, the elementary class, the middle class, the higher class, the higher class, and the training class to which the plaintiff A belongs, according to the student's career and actual ability.

In the swimming pool of this case, five Les are installed.

Plaintiff

In the event of an accident in A’s multi-ice practice, the Plaintiff Company A received various lessons from the instructor G in the instant swimming pool from around 10:00 on January 23, 2015, from around 200, from around 200, from around 200, from around 200, from around 200, from around 200, from around 10:30, from around 10:30 on the same day.

Plaintiff

A, around 10:37 on the same day during the course of the course of the above dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice dice

Plaintiff

A’s present state Plaintiff A is unable to take or move food on his own due to damage to the scale of water caused by the instant accident, and such a situation seems to continue during the life period due to the state of crypology, namely, the state of loss of labor capacity of 100% (hereinafter “current state”).

[Reasons for Recognition] No dispute exists, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Gap evidence Nos. 9, Eul evidence Nos. 5 and 6, and this Court.