beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly share 102,39,717 won to Plaintiff A, and one million won to Plaintiff B and each of them on September 2, 2016.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. At around 13:20 on November 30, 2012, Plaintiff A finished a course of study of Acuadroba at the Damwon site located in the Geumnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Geumsan-gun operated by Defendant Geumsan-gun, and she shocked Defendant C with their head during the course of moving to 1Ra, the ice from the 1stra, which is an exclusive licensee for free swimming (hereinafter “instant accident”). The completion of a course of study, etc., and the movement to the free swimming pool is at the risk of collision with other users, so the students of the swimming pool of this case would normally complete the course of study, and move to outside water by using other directions than 1Ra, an exclusive licensee for free swimming, and move to outside water. On the wall of the above swimming pool, Plaintiff C suffers from damage to the body of the Plaintiff and the sonmal body of 2, etc. due to the exposure of her head.
3) Plaintiff B is the husband of Plaintiff A. 【A’s ground for recognition’s absence of any dispute, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 5, and 17 (including branch numbers, if any, and hereinafter the same shall apply).
each entry or video, the whole purport of the pleading;
B. According to the above facts of recognition, Defendant C committed ice ice without examining whether there is a person belonging to a swimming pool where multi-ice ice ice is prohibited, and as a result, Defendant C had safety personnel working in the swimming pool frequently examine the swimming pool from time to time to time to check the swimming pool to prevent the Plaintiff A from passing through a free swimming pool, or Defendant C from passing through a free swimming pool, thereby causing the instant accident due to negligence, which caused the Plaintiff’s injury and mental damage, and thereby, the Defendants jointly and severally liable for compensation for damage to the Plaintiffs.
Defendant C, as a result, can see the accident of this case.